| The
source of this text is Abi bin abi Taleb, Nahj Al-Belagha, who lived
between 556-619 of the Common Era. It has been interpreted by Imam
Muhammad Abdu, Vol. 1, Dar-Al-Balagha, Beirut, 2nd edition, 1985.
You can also find it in the Arab Development Report published by the
UNDP in 2002. |
No
vessel is limitless, except for the vessel of knowledge which forever
expands.
- If God were to
humiliate a human being, He would deny him knowledge.
- No wealth equals
the mind, no poverty equals ignorance, no heritage equals culture, and
no support is greater than advice.
- Wisdom is the
believer's quest, to be sought everywhere, even among the deceitful.
- A person is
worth what he or she excels at.
- No wealth can
profit you more than the mind, no isolation can be more desolate than
conceit, no policy can be wiser than prudence, no generosity can be
better than decency, no heritage can be more bountiful than culture,
no guidance can be truer than inspiration, no enterprise can be more
successful than goodness, and no honour can surpass knowledge.
- Knowledge is
superior to wealth. Knowledge guards you whereas you guard
wealth. Wealth decreases with expenditure, whereas knowledge
multiplies with dissemination. A good material deed vanishes as
the material resources behind it vanish, whereas to knowledge we are
indebted forever.
- Thanks to
knowledge, you command people's respect during your lifetime and their
kind memory after your death.
- Knowledge rules
over wealth. Those who treasure wealth perish while they are
still alive, whereas scholars live forever. They only disappear
in physical image, but in others' hearts their memories are enshrined.
- Knowledge is the
twin of action. He who is knowledgeable must act.
Knowledge calls upon action; if answered, it will stay.
Otherwise, it will depart.
|
|
Knowledge
Management Books from the Syre Consulting English Bookshop
The
question we have been often asked, and subsequently worked on, is : "How can we
leverage a tried and trusted knowledge base (that we built up in our home
country) across new companies we have acquired in Europe?"
Usually this question is not asked before the acquisition or the merger. It is
asked a few months or a couple of years later, when the question "How
can we make better use of what we know that we know or that we don't know
that we know" becomes paramount.
We
have experience of facilitating cross-border work and cross-cultural
knowledge management in FMCG (fast moving consumer goods companies), the
aerospace industry, in professional services companies, the pharmaceutical
industry and many other industries. Our job is not to be expert in
the content of each of these industries, that is the job of your own
experts. Where we add value is by bringing our experience,
facilitation skills and processes into play when there is a need for you
to share present knowledge among a wider circle of experts, to create new
products, markets or levels of efficiency by leveraging present
knowledge, or when you need to create new knowledge based on what you know
your experts are capable of doing.
There are many ways of managing organisational knowledge, but each must be tailored to the context
of the company. Knowledge is two things : it is both a stock and a
flow. But many companies get stuck at the stock stage, they sit on
static knowledge and dead human and intellectual capital. To make
the knowledge, human capital and intellectual capital flow you need to put in place a set of
fairly simple activities and processes, some of them based on human
resource practice and some of them based on technology.
Everything we do for our clients at Systèmes et Ressources (also known as
Syre Consulting) has to do with knowledge management,
whether it is team building, organising best practice seminars or
internal-coaching seminars in which your professionals educate each other
or by explaining how to put in place knowledge bases rooted in the
practice of your company and not in the language of IT-speak. Savvy
practitioners know that Knowledge
management is not only about technology, especially for multinational or
international companies. It is also about managing
knowledge workers and professionals
across borders and getting them to share their knowledge, build
new competencies, reinforce old competencies and discard no longer useful
competencies.
Before the advent of writing, accrued wisdom, daily updating of
the group via story-telling and group-mythologising were very good knowledge management
tools. They still are. But today, we have information technology
and this leads some people to forget the fact that we need to leverage IT with
practical knowledge of different national cultures and business
practices. Conversations, Gossip and Stories all exist in Belgium,
Holland, France, the United States and the United Kingdom and they can all
be perceived positively or negatively : as ways of creating knowledge and
making it flow or as ways for change-resistant people to create push-back
against perceived foreign intervention.
Let us know about your Knowledge
Management needs in France and/or Benelux.
Systèmes
& Ressources (Syre Consulting)
Téléphone : +33 1
30 61 46 17
Pour une réponse rapide par
courrier électronique :
For a quick email response, send
a message to :
|
There are things the firm does not know that it knows.
This is where to get the biggest bang for your buck in Knowledge
Management territory. It is well attested that human beings have biases : we have a bias
to hiring people who went to the same school, who play the same sports, who wear suits we
think we would look good in, and we are also biased towards being satisfied with the
information we find closest to hand, especially if isn't known that there is better
information, which could better serve the project, a little farther away in the
company. In
such cases, we and the firm do less well than we are capable of doing. If only we
knew what was going on elsewhere in the company ! If only we were capable of sharing
best practicies across departments ! If only the company had some sort of
mechanism in place to let other parts of itself know that the wheel has already been
invented ! That's right, there should be no need to invent it again. Yet, many
enormous companies while knowing that they have some sort of institutional knowledge, do
not know what exactly it is. They guiltily find themselves reinventing what
has already been done, or worse, failing time and again in projects in which they have
already failed.
A major part of managing knowledge is learning from our mistakes and
failures, but they have to be admitted as such, and accepted. A work environment of
unconditional acceptance must be encouraged. A knowledge bank of what has worked and
what has not worked must be in place. How good is your company's knowledge bank ?
What sort of information does it contain about past failures, which could be turned
to your advantage, past successes which could be further built upon ?
Another
important objective of managing knowledge is to leverage wealth through nurturing
intellectual capital, as Texaco and BP have done, yet many firms do not
realise that their
traditional budgeting processes destroy intellectual capital, stifle initiative, undermine
the drive to increase shareholder value, fail to support customer service and act as a
barrier to process improvement. What about your budgeting system ? Is it
something you think about with pleasure or something you prefer to forget ? If your
reply tends to the latter part of the spectrum, beware ! Your company is
definitely destroying more wealth than it is creating.

Paradoxically,
in an ambiguous world we need ambivalence and "ambivalence" in an organisational
setting means the meeting and creative confrontation of many minds. Better
encouragement and management of information redundancies can often avoid superfluous
action. But recent massive layoffs, re-engineering and other phenomena such as downsizing
have often signalled the arrival of the grim reaper. New information and communications technologies have rarely been used to their
full potential to communicate within the walls of the company the sort of information that
used to be sent by word of mouth, or imitated between apprentice and master. Information can
circulate fairly easily within a group of up to about 150 people, but it has problems jumping over the natural
barriers formed between groups, cities, regions, countries and languages.
Knowledge
Management is not new. It has always been an essential part of success, but it used
to be a lot easier in small groups. The techniques of knowledge codification,
management and transfer are as traditional as human speech around the wood fire, and as
modern as GroupWare "
a concept which designates both the human and
organisational processes of working in a group and the technological tools which favour
it." (Jean-Yves Prax, La Gestion électronique documentaire, 1998, Paris,
InterEditions).
There
is often some confusion between Information Systems, Electronic Document Management and
Knowledge Management. As a general rule, as soon as the technology part of a project
begins to cost more than one third of the budget, it is no longer a Knowledge Management
project, but an Information Technology project. A good Electronic Document Management
system is quite often a necessary, but is not a sufficient, basis for a Knowledge
Management system.
|